Feed aggregator

Policy coherence is widely regarded as essential for achieving sustainable development, climate targets, and reducing inequality, as reflected in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Recent scholarship has moved beyond technocratic approaches, drawing on comparative politics, particularly the “3 I's” of ideas, interests, and institutions, to highlight the inherently political nature of coherence. Yet even these studies often treat coherence as binary, easily observable, and intrinsically beneficial. Building on a coherence literature focused on discourses and frames, this paper challenges these assumptions by examining how policy (in)coherence is constructed and contested. Focusing on policy implementation in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany's coal heartland, we analyse two cases before and during the 2022 energy crisis triggered by the war in Ukraine: the commissioning of the Datteln IV hard coal plant in 2020, and the clearance of the village of Lützerath for mining in 2023. Drawing on 28 semi-structured interviews with German energy, climate, and environmental experts, alongside policy and media analysis, we find that (in)coherence is greatly constructed and contested under shifting political and economic pressures, instrumentalised and legitimisatised by different actors to advance their interests, and profoundly shaped by temporal dynamics. Given recent findings that challenge the 2030 Agenda's assumption that policy coherence reduces inequalities, we also explore how (in)coherence is perceived to shape multidimensional inequality in the Energiewende more broadly. Here, we find that (in)coherence is most prominently perceived to cause delays in climate mitigation, disproportionately affecting youth, low-income households, migrants, and activists. In this context, (in)coherence is not merely technical, political nor constructed, but fundamentally a matter of justice, shifting the analytical focus from whether policies and their implementation are coherent to how, and for whom, coherence matters.

Policy coherence is widely regarded as essential for achieving sustainable development, climate targets, and reducing inequality, as reflected in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Recent scholarship has moved beyond technocratic approaches, drawing on comparative politics, particularly the “3 I's” of ideas, interests, and institutions, to highlight the inherently political nature of coherence. Yet even these studies often treat coherence as binary, easily observable, and intrinsically beneficial. Building on a coherence literature focused on discourses and frames, this paper challenges these assumptions by examining how policy (in)coherence is constructed and contested. Focusing on policy implementation in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany's coal heartland, we analyse two cases before and during the 2022 energy crisis triggered by the war in Ukraine: the commissioning of the Datteln IV hard coal plant in 2020, and the clearance of the village of Lützerath for mining in 2023. Drawing on 28 semi-structured interviews with German energy, climate, and environmental experts, alongside policy and media analysis, we find that (in)coherence is greatly constructed and contested under shifting political and economic pressures, instrumentalised and legitimisatised by different actors to advance their interests, and profoundly shaped by temporal dynamics. Given recent findings that challenge the 2030 Agenda's assumption that policy coherence reduces inequalities, we also explore how (in)coherence is perceived to shape multidimensional inequality in the Energiewende more broadly. Here, we find that (in)coherence is most prominently perceived to cause delays in climate mitigation, disproportionately affecting youth, low-income households, migrants, and activists. In this context, (in)coherence is not merely technical, political nor constructed, but fundamentally a matter of justice, shifting the analytical focus from whether policies and their implementation are coherent to how, and for whom, coherence matters.

Policy coherence is widely regarded as essential for achieving sustainable development, climate targets, and reducing inequality, as reflected in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Recent scholarship has moved beyond technocratic approaches, drawing on comparative politics, particularly the “3 I's” of ideas, interests, and institutions, to highlight the inherently political nature of coherence. Yet even these studies often treat coherence as binary, easily observable, and intrinsically beneficial. Building on a coherence literature focused on discourses and frames, this paper challenges these assumptions by examining how policy (in)coherence is constructed and contested. Focusing on policy implementation in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany's coal heartland, we analyse two cases before and during the 2022 energy crisis triggered by the war in Ukraine: the commissioning of the Datteln IV hard coal plant in 2020, and the clearance of the village of Lützerath for mining in 2023. Drawing on 28 semi-structured interviews with German energy, climate, and environmental experts, alongside policy and media analysis, we find that (in)coherence is greatly constructed and contested under shifting political and economic pressures, instrumentalised and legitimisatised by different actors to advance their interests, and profoundly shaped by temporal dynamics. Given recent findings that challenge the 2030 Agenda's assumption that policy coherence reduces inequalities, we also explore how (in)coherence is perceived to shape multidimensional inequality in the Energiewende more broadly. Here, we find that (in)coherence is most prominently perceived to cause delays in climate mitigation, disproportionately affecting youth, low-income households, migrants, and activists. In this context, (in)coherence is not merely technical, political nor constructed, but fundamentally a matter of justice, shifting the analytical focus from whether policies and their implementation are coherent to how, and for whom, coherence matters.

Mit viel Sonnenschein und hohen Temperaturen sagt der Sommer das erste Mal Hallo. Da braucht vor allem die empfindliche Kinderhaut einen zuverlässigen Schutz. Nur im Gewinnspiel-Newsletter verlosen wir zehn Sets mit je zwei Kinder-Sonnencremen von Pioupiou.

Douglas Wilson predigt ein radikales Rollenbild: Frauen sollen schweigen, gehorchen – und am besten nicht wählen. Der US-Pastor hat beste Kontakte ins republikanische Machtzentrum. Warum seine Ideen heute gefährlich nah am politischen Mainstream sind.

Die Liga hat das Strafmass für Young-jun Lee von GC und Aaraus Linus Obexer nach deren Roten Karten im Barrage-Rückspiel festgelegt.

Pfingsten steht vor der Tür – und mit dem Feiertag die ideale Gelegenheit für ungestörte Wanderungen. Blick zeigt dir fünf Wanderwege, auf denen du den Massen entfliehen und die pure Bergidylle geniessen kannst.

Von jedem verdienten Franken gehen knapp 40 Rappen an staatliche Einrichtungen. Dafür bist du versichert, wenn es zu Krankheit oder Arbeitslosigkeit kommt.

Schnipp, schnapp: Christina Hänni zeigt sich auf Social Media mit komplett neuem Haarschnitt – und überrascht damit ihre Fans, die sie teilweise nicht wiedererkennen.

Daniel Noah verabschiedet sich von «Alles was zählt». Nach intensiven Jahren voller dramatischer Geschichten und emotionaler Momente verlässt der Schauspieler die Serie und bedankt sich bei Fans und Kollegen.

Oldtimerfreunde wissen es längst: Traditionsgemäss trifft man sich am Pfingstwochenende zum O-iO (Oldtimer in Obwalden) – und eine Woche später zur Klassikmesse in Luzern. Zwei Anlässe in der Zentralschweiz, die viel Publikum begeistern werden.

Am Waldrand Brennnesseltriebe pflücken und daraus feine Gnocchi zaubern: Dieses Frühlingsrezept verbindet Naturgenuss und Kulinarik.

Das Barrage-Rückspiel bietet alles, was das Fussball-Herz begehrt. Harte Zweikämpfe, Tore, Spannung und Leidenschaft pur. Blick-Schiri-Experte Urs Meier nimmt die kniffligen Entscheide unter die Lupe.

Eine Schweizer Familie filmt, wie zwei Heissluftballons schnell an Höhe verlieren. Die Szenen spielen sich letztes Wochenende über Langenthal BE ab. Blick erklärt dir, weshalb das Ganze so gewollt war.

Im Podcast «intim&laut» erzählt Blick-Gesellschaftsredaktorin Sandra Casalini von einem Date mit einem Mann in einer offenen Beziehung. Die Gefahr, dass eine solche zu einem Wettbewerb wird, kennt Paartherapeutin Ramona Zenger auch aus ihrer Praxis.

Wieder Barrage, wieder kein Aufstieg. Im zweiten Duell mit GC ist Aarau deutlich näher dran als vor einem Jahr. Am Ende ärgert sich der Challenge-League-Klub aber vor allem über den Schiedsrichter.

Nach Heim und Lehre wuchsen David Busch die Rechnungen rasch über den Kopf. Im Juni entscheidet das Basler Stimmvolk über einen freiwilligen Lohnabzug zum Schutz vor Steuerschulden.

L'Iran publie une carte affirmant la « supervision des forces armées » sur plus de 22 000 kilomètres carrés de la voie navigable.

Vaduz holt zwei Spieler von Greuther Fürth. Es sind die beiden ersten Neuzugänge nach dem Aufstieg.

From 25 to 27 May, a delegation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) of six MEPs led by the Committee Chair David McAllister (EPP, Germany) will visit Cape Town, Pretoria, and Johannesburg, South Africa.
The delegation will meet South African political leaders and partners to discuss deepening EU-South Africa cooperation. Key topics include international relations in a changing geopolitical landscape, security, political ties, and the Global Gateway, the EU's strategy for global infrastructure investment.
AFET Missions
Source : © European Union, 2026 - EP