Europäische Union

Am Donnerstag forderte das Parlament die EU auf, mehr Verantwortung für die europäische Sicherheit zu übernehmen und sich tatkräftig für einen dauerhaften Frieden in der Ukraine einzusetzen.
Ausschuss für auswärtige Angelegenheiten

Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2025 - EP

Am Donnerstag forderte das Parlament die EU auf, mehr Verantwortung für die europäische Sicherheit zu übernehmen und sich tatkräftig für einen dauerhaften Frieden in der Ukraine einzusetzen.
Ausschuss für auswärtige Angelegenheiten

Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2025 - EP

Am Donnerstag hat das Parlament seine Prioritäten für die EU-Strategie für die Rechte von Menschen mit Behinderungen ab 2025 angenommen.
Ausschuss für Beschäftigung und soziale Angelegenheiten

Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2025 - EP

Die neuen Regeln erhöhen Transparenz und demokratische Rechenschaftspflicht bei Interessenvertretung für Drittstaaten, ohne legitimes zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement einzuschränken.
Ausschuss für Binnenmarkt und Verbraucherschutz

Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2025 - EP

La journaliste algérienne Fayrouz Ziani a été distinguée par un Emmy International, l’une des récompenses les plus prestigieuses au monde. Ce prix, qui honore une […]

L’article Emmy Awards 2025 : la journaliste algérienne Fayrouz Ziani distinguée à New York est apparu en premier sur .

Les récentes intempéries et les chutes de neige abondantes depuis hier ont entraîné la fermeture de nombreuses routes et axes routiers dans plusieurs wilayas. Selon […]

L’article Info trafic en temps réel : Liste des routes fermées par la neige ce jeudi 27 novembre est apparu en premier sur .

Abgeordnete der Sozialdemokraten, der liberalen Renew, der Grünen und der Linken werfen den konservativen und rechtspopulistischen Kollegen vor, eine Kampagne gegen zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen zu führen.

Le procès du complexe IMETAL continue de mettre au jour une cascade d’irrégularités, de tensions internes et de décisions contestées.  Devant le juge, les cadres […]

L’article « Les décisions venaient d’en haut » : déballage ahurissant au procès Imetal et peines sévères requises est apparu en premier sur .

Die EU ist gerade dabei, ihr Migrations- und Asylsystem grundlegend neu zu ordnen. Der Kommissar wirbt in seinen ersten 100 Amtstagen für strengere Rückführungsregeln.

Dauer des Videos : 60'

Haftungsausschluss : Die Verdolmetschung der Debatten soll die Kommunikation erleichtern, sie stellt jedoch keine authentische Aufzeichnung der Debatten dar. Authentisch sind nur die Originalfassungen der Reden bzw. ihre überprüften schriftlichen Übersetzungen.
Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2025 - EP

Une recommandation du médiateur fédéral belge a été émise afin de réexaminer la nécessité de la révision de l’actuelle procédure de demande de visa Schengen […]

L’article Visa Schengen pour la Belgique : la procédure de demande remise en question est apparu en premier sur .

In this chapter we draw on our research with displaced people, conflict, violence, gender, and humanitarian aid between 2006 and 2024 in different African countries, which we conducted separately but were brought together by these shared research interests. We address the nexus between conflict, peace, and forced migration using examples from Africa. We situate the discussion within the precolonial, colonial, and postcolonial eras, which we take not as mere footnotes but as salient periods in the continent’s history that have influenced current conflicts and forced displacement in Africa. We therefore emphasize the role of history in understanding contemporary conflicts and forced migration on the continent. In doing so, we critique Western research perspectives on forms of violence and their ahistorical explanations of contemporary violent conflicts in Africa. We explain the role of colonial borders not only in engendering conflict but also in creating structural obstacles for refugees to contribute to transformation in countries of origin. We also critique the separation of peacebuilding in the countries of origin from refugee protection in host countries and highlight this as a limitation of global (i.e., Western) perspectives on peacebuilding.

In today's edition: Donazzan's Space Act, CSAM file moves, Shein RFI

The world is moving away from a single, post-2000 consensus around multilateralism and poverty reduction. What replaces it depends on which coalition wins the argument, and then bakes that argument into institutions and finance. So what are the visions for the global development architecture in 2030 that we see? One is ‘Aid Retrenchment with Nationalist Conditionality’. Assistance is folded into foreign, trade, and interior policy. Grants shrink, multilateral agencies are sidelined, and cooperation becomes bilateral deals tied to migration control, geopolitical alignment, or access to minerals. Rights, gender, and climate justice recede. A second world is ‘Strategic Multilateralism’. The multilateral development banks stay central, but their remit narrows to macro-stability, crisis response, and “risk containment”. Concessional finance is rationed to countries seen as fragile or geostrategic. Aid rhetoric turns technocratic and securitised and health framed as biosecurity. A third vision is ‘Pluralist Development Cooperation’. There is no single system, but many partially overlapping regimes: Chinese, Indian, Gulf, regional, and club initiatives. Low and middle income countries gain bargaining space by choosing across offers. The trade-off is fragmentation. Rules on debt workouts, safeguards, and transparency diverge, and global public goods struggle for predictable funding. Finally, a fourth vision is ‘Global Solidarity 2.0’. Development cooperation is rebuilt around shared risks such as climate stability, pandemics, antimicrobial resistance, and debt contagion. North and South co-lead a pooled Global Public Goods Facility. Contributions reflect income and carbon profile, and access reflects exposure to cross-border risk. The donor-recipient binary fades, even if frictions persist.

Thursday 27 November

Source : © European Union, 2025 - EP

La saison hivernale s’installe progressivement sur l’Algérie, annonçant des journées froides, pluvieuses et neigeuses sur de nombreuses régions du pays. Ce jeudi 27 novembre, les […]

L’article ALERTES MÉTÉO du jeudi 27/11 : vigilance « orange » fortes pluies et chutes de neige dans ces wilayas est apparu en premier sur .

Parliament and Council have struck a deal on a more open and competitive EU payment services sector, with strong defences against fraud and data breaches.
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

Source : © European Union, 2025 - EP

On 21 October 2025, the European Commission under Ursula von der Leyen's second mandate adopted its work programme for 2026 (2026 CWP). In line with the Commission President's political guidelines and letter of intent and highlighting the need for full implementation of Mario Draghi's competitiveness report, the 2026 CWP places a strong emphasis on competitiveness, innovation and collective security. In parallel, the Commission commits to advancing simplification, implementation, and this year, also to strengthening enforcement. These three areas will remain key horizontal priorities for the entire Commission mandate. Just like last year's CWP, the 2026 CWP adheres to the seven headline ambitions put forward in the political guidelines. It is accompanied by a report on implementation, simplification and enforcement, the first of its kind. This new annual report is set to replace the annual burden survey. Annex I of the 2026 CWP puts forward 70 major new legislative and non-legislative initiatives, 44 % of which fall under the competitiveness headline ambition. (Up to) 48 of the new initiatives are legislative, including three sector-specific omnibus packages (on energy product legislation, taxation and citizens). Of the forthcoming legislative initiatives, 67 % are likely revisions of existing legislation, while more than half have a strong simplification dimension. Unlike previous CWPs, the 2026 CWP does not indicate whether a legislative initiative will be accompanied by an impact assessment; this lack of transparency runs counter to the spirit of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making. Information on the Commission's 'Have your say' portal shows that, at the time of writing, two thirds of the up to 48 legislative initiatives were expected to be accompanied by an impact assessment (though the final number may be higher). The annual evaluation plan presented in Annex II of the CWP, comprising 20 evaluations, does not appear exhaustive. Finally, the communication on Better Regulation, expected in Q2 2026, may entail a revision of the Better Regulation Guidelines, the first since 2021.
Source : © European Union, 2025 - EP

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the European Union (EU) has adopted 19 sanctions packages against Russia in close coordination with its Group of Seven partners. As part of these measures, the EU has immobilised around EUR 210 billion of Russia’s sovereign assets and froze around EUR 28 billion of private assets within its jurisdiction, while actively addressing possible utilisation of these funds as reparations owed to Ukraine by Russia under international law. Although significant steps have been taken in terms of private assets and windfall profits, many legal issues concerning the confiscation or management of state assets remain unaddressed. Hence, this paper aims to map current arguments and developments, in order to propose viable options for the use of these three asset types as reparations under EU and international law. At the EU level, proposals under the Common Foreign and Security Policy, especially those relating to the Central Bank of Russia’s (CBR) assets, are hindered by unanimity decision-making processes and the possible use of veto powers by Member States. At the international level, CBR assets are protected by the laws of state immunity. It therefore remains questionable under what circumstances such assets could lawfully be utilised for reparations. This paper argues that currently the most viable legal option, which addresses internal and international challenges, is the establishment of an EU Instrument (Reparations Loan). This could be achieved through carefully designated steps, allowing a qualified majority vote to prolong restrictive measures concerning immobilisation of CBR assets, ensuring temporality and reversibility while connecting this instrument to existing reparations and compensation mechanisms that adjudicate upon Russia’s violations and its obligation to pay reparations or compensation. At an international level, this paper argues that an EU Instrument can be justified in terms of central bank assets’ immunity by offering a new interpretation of the relationship between procedural rules on immunities and secondary rules on countermeasures. Such argumentation does, however, involve important legal risks highlighted throughout the paper.
Source : © European Union, 2025 - EP